Tahun 2015
8 years ago
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
everytime sy baca judgment frm abdul malik ishak J...mesti sy rs cm best je nk jd judge neh.so this morning, when i was doing my research, i came across this case wc was decided by his lordship.
RE DETENTION OF LEONARD TEOH HOOI LEONG (1998) 1 MLJ 757
background facts dlm his judgment adalah sgt comel okeh!!rasa mcm baca novel ke ape ntah..sbb sy adalah excited, so sy baik ati nk copy n share it with the rest
RE DETENTION OF LEONARD TEOH HOOI LEONG (1998) 1 MLJ 757
background facts dlm his judgment adalah sgt comel okeh!!rasa mcm baca novel ke ape ntah..sbb sy adalah excited, so sy baik ati nk copy n share it with the rest
background facts
"In his capacity as an advocate and solicitor, Leonard Teoh acted for one Nor'aishah bte Bokhari ('Nor'aishah'), a Malay lady of 25 years of age. She was born a Muslim and at the material time professing the Islamic religion and was working with Citibank in Kuala Lumpur. Trouble reared its ugly head when she fell in love with one Joseph Arnold Lee, a Christian Chinese. The cupid arrow must have struck Nor'aishah right smack into her heart so much so that she lost all sense of balance. He must have used love portion number 9, for she seemed to be on cloud nine. As Francis Bacon once remarked: 'It is impossible to love and be wise'. Shakespeare too in 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' once said: 'The course of true love never did run smooth'. Reverting back to the mainstream of the case, Nor'aishah decided to renounce the Islamic faith and was bent on embracing Christianity."
hah...cumel tak judge ni..siap quote shakespeare lagik..cupid arrow must have smack into her heart? tu yg tak tahan tuh..adeh2..ada love prtion number 9 laa bagai.
yg pastinya i enjoyed reading his lordship judgment.tp ada sorg judge ni..agak pening skit laa klu baca judgment dia. tak lain tak bukan..jeng jenge jenggg
AJAIB SINGH J
dia punya judgment pon ajaib gila..ayat yg agak ajaib smbl berpusing2.payah skit nk paham sbb terlalu ajaib..heheh..my humble apology my lord..for i belive this is a compliment.jgn lerr kna contempt plak..ahhahahah
kdg2 bila baca judgment frm malik ishak J, boleh terasa cam beliau bercerita dgn penuh perasaan.
ada satu kes ni, if im not mistaken..counsel for the plaintif made an application to recuse his lordship frm the trial contemplating for real danger of bias.
in his judgment, hislordship wrote;
"silence is the best anecdote at this point of time"
the way he portray the above sentence, as if mcm terasa je dgn loyer ni sbb mintak dia to recuse himself. cute kan?
ada dlm kes mana ntah..sy kurang ingt, his lordship tulis cm neh...
"my heart and soul shall collapse like a deck of cards"
sekali lagi sy rasa chumel sgtt...hihihih
nih entry sy yg ke-100.hahaha.leh jd blogger tegar tk kiranya nih..lalala.
dear mr butum fulem..
i'm choooo choriii (maksud dia im so sorry..tiru gaya peejburhan)
butum fulem pon ok lah kan?
janji rawk..
ahahhahaah
cerita selanjutnya,..
harrier size xs sy tuh sekali lagi terciom divider jln..(tatau aa bende tu org pgl divider ke hape ke kan..yg kaler putih itam dia cat belang2 tu, slalu kat tepi jalan).
yang best nya..aritu dh ciom skali.masa tu time tgh chambering lg.br je amek keta lak tu.dlm renyai2 ujan...mata ala2 kelabu. ada laa sorg penumpang yg agak2 tak membantu time tu (ampon tuan sbb kutuk tuan..ahahha).so tmpt yg kna tu berlekuk laa..ceh..keta aku curvy tuh..ala2 model ke apa..eheheh.kna kat bhg bwh pintu depan..belah kiri.
everytime nk bukak pintu..ada cm bunyi2 kurang enak laa skut.tp aku wat bodoh je laa..nk p anta ketuk cam mahal.abah sy ckp around 500. okeh okeh..500 time tgh chambering tu kire bnyk laa tu..leh menggugat kitaran bajet aku tau..mana ak nye..chmbering bkn ado gaji..takat elaun je.aku dpt 1000 je time tu sebulan.byr duet keta dh separuh.klu aku anto g ketuk...bulan tu alamatnye mmg pokai laa..nk mintak duit mak..mmg konpem tak laa.malu seh asik mintak mak je dr kecik.
so awl2 aku dh pesan kat mak aku jgn wat ape2 kat keta tu..biarlaa bunyik pintu tu tk best pon.t aku dh ado gj..aku p laa anto wokchop.ada skali tu aku tk de kat sini..so mak aku ngn abah g anto keta tu..kasi ketuk kt part yg lekuk tu.aku blk2 je..adesssss...tgk2 450 kna.time tu pon tak abis chambering lagik.so terpakse laa korek tabung gajah aku kuarkan duit syiling2 tu nk byr blk...mak aku ckp takyah..tp aku tak ske nnt abg2 aku ejek kata aku ni manja..asik kna mak tulun jaa..abg2 sy mmg hampeh ok!!!suka jer nk ejek2 org.
bukannye aku kedekut nk repair keta tu.tp sebnanye..aku ada instict yg menagtakan...one suweeeeet day, aku akan langgar divider and kna kat tempat tu gak.so yg best nya..instinct aku mmg tepat.pg td pas abis kes kt jln duta, aku nk kuar dr parking...tetiba aku dgr bunyi..
srettttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt...adeh.sah.kna lagik.dulu kna kat court kl.arini pon kat court kl gak,lekuk dia pon kat tmpt yg sama.
dh ler kes tk jalan.keta plak kemek...syabbbasss inspector sahab!!!!
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
cam biasala..bila dh prepare case, it s either hakim ada kes lain for sambung bicara, dpp ada kes lain, or saksi tak dtg. or loyer tak sedia.mengong!!!!
ok pagi td..semua pihak dh sedia.nk continue cross je.n ada lagi satu saksi baru.aku pon poyo2 laa suh pgl saksi aku masuk court.lepas bsumpah hape smua..dpp pon nk start cross..tetiba..muka saksi tu ala2 blur...
pehtu dia start ckp tamil.aduiyaiiii.pd hal aku dh request awl2 lagi nk jurubahasa tamil since both saksi today mmg tak fluent malay or english.ruper2nye intep tamil tu coti daaaa...buang karan!!!!!
pastu aku pon g mkn roti canai dgn lagi 2 loyer bank tu..hahah..
sekian terima kasih.
ok..dh pukul 3.17am
akhirnya sy dibenarkan tdo
janji pukul 3
tp terlebih smp 3.17
buat kje smbl sembang
mana nk jln
pdn muka
muka siapa?
muka sy lah..
hahahhha
kpd anda, jgn kata sy kwn tak kenang budi ya
wh yaa..selamat mlm kamu2
sy mau tdur
mau mimpi ke osaka
lalallallala
mata sy mmg degil kot.suka je takmo tdo yaa..apa nk jd lah ni..dh kul 2.10 am.sok sy ada trial fop.sgt mls laa..dh laaa sok dpp yg cross.busan.sy lebih suka cros saksi dr conduct chief xm.sbb bila cross...sy tak perlu prepare awal2.smua kna spontaneous n must be a real manupulative person.dh lama tak main cross2 kes murder n 39B ..rindu laa plak..
sy mahu pergi osaka lah kawan2!!!
Monday, April 27, 2009
nothing's pending for the time being.so i have the opprtunity to laze around in the office and blog hopping..hahaha..anyway, me n a fren of mine had this conversation on one judicial review hearing before YA Lau Bee Lan. we talked about the white book (sy br tau apa itu white boook) and oso brutum fulmen (which he pronounced it as butum fullem)..haha bantai je laa pakcik oiii..latin maxim kan.klu latino speaks malay pon bunyik dia cam doremon cakap jawa.
read an article this morning.
YA Lau Bee Lan has granted leave for the applicant under o53 RHC. seeking an order for certiorari, the applicant was dissatisfied with the Home Ministry's decision prohibiting the use of the word "Allah" in the Herald Catholic Weekly as a condition to its publication permit for the year 2009.
there are 7 other declarations sought by the applicants, those are inter alia;
1. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the Herald in the exercise of his right that other religions other than Islam may be practised in peace.
2. That Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution does not empower the respondents to prohibit the applicant from using the word "Allah" in the Herald.
3. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the weekly in the exercise of his right to freedom of speech and expression.
4. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the Herald in the exercise of his freedom of religion which includes the right to manage its own religious affairs.
5. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the Herald in the exercise his right in respect of education of the Catholic congregation in the Christian religion.
6. That the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 does not authorise the respondents to prohibit the applicant from using the word "Allah" in the Herald and
7. That the word "Allah" is not exclusive to the religion of Islam
ermmm..look at item no.7...too much arent they? but somthing for u peeps to ponder, why they wanna use the word Allah to describe their God?
im not sure whtehr bible has ever mentioned the word "Allah" as i havent got the opportunity to read the text yet.
i noticed tht i am becoming more serious in my writings lately..ntah hape pasai ntah yaaa..mungkin sudah tiba masa untuk ....?
anyway..saja laa nk bg tau..pelakon bollywood yg kawen dgn abishek tu nama dia aishwarya rai..bukan ASHWARA RAI...aishwarya raidah pon ok gak kot..ahahahahahahha
read an article this morning.
YA Lau Bee Lan has granted leave for the applicant under o53 RHC. seeking an order for certiorari, the applicant was dissatisfied with the Home Ministry's decision prohibiting the use of the word "Allah" in the Herald Catholic Weekly as a condition to its publication permit for the year 2009.
there are 7 other declarations sought by the applicants, those are inter alia;
1. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the Herald in the exercise of his right that other religions other than Islam may be practised in peace.
2. That Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution does not empower the respondents to prohibit the applicant from using the word "Allah" in the Herald.
3. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the weekly in the exercise of his right to freedom of speech and expression.
4. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the Herald in the exercise of his freedom of religion which includes the right to manage its own religious affairs.
5. That the applicant has the constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in the Herald in the exercise his right in respect of education of the Catholic congregation in the Christian religion.
6. That the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 does not authorise the respondents to prohibit the applicant from using the word "Allah" in the Herald and
7. That the word "Allah" is not exclusive to the religion of Islam
ermmm..look at item no.7...too much arent they? but somthing for u peeps to ponder, why they wanna use the word Allah to describe their God?
im not sure whtehr bible has ever mentioned the word "Allah" as i havent got the opportunity to read the text yet.
i noticed tht i am becoming more serious in my writings lately..ntah hape pasai ntah yaaa..mungkin sudah tiba masa untuk ....?
anyway..saja laa nk bg tau..pelakon bollywood yg kawen dgn abishek tu nama dia aishwarya rai..bukan ASHWARA RAI...aishwarya raidah pon ok gak kot..ahahahahahahha
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
pkr vs bn
or
bn vs pkr
pkr:-
anwar-sodomy
mb nizar-"sembah patik sembah derhaka"
sivakumar-suspension of 7 assemblymen not valid
tan sri khalid-uitm for non bumi
-->the lists are exhaustive
bn:-
-none-
clean record?klu clean cam ne ko nak hentam aku..aku nk hentam ko?ko je lah bleh hentam aku.mmg betul2 clean kot.sbb tu masih bertahan hingga ke hari ini..ala ala clean and clear..pencuci muka jenama apa ntah..sorry lah ..since sy cuma pakai bedak sejuk n mustika ratu..so jenama2 lain sy kurengg tau lah.
tp saya amat tertarik dgn frasa sembah patik sembah derhaka. sgt berhemah dan sgt bertoleransi..juga terasa seperti berada di zaman hang tuah.
alangkah bagus nya tika itu, apabila sultan mansur shah mentitahkan hang tuah supaya membunuh sahabat karibnya hang jebat, hang tuah menjawab sebegini:-
"AMPUN TUANKU.SEMBAH PATIK SEMBAH DERHAKA.SUNGGUHPUN TUANKU RAJA BERTAKHTA, ADAPUN PATIK PACAL YANG HINA.TAK MUNGKIN PATIK SANGGUP MENODA TAMING SARI INI DENGAN DARAH ORANG BERSAUDARA"
tetiba rasa cam terbayang plak ceta hang tuah dolu2..tak relevan btul..tp knapa lak blog ni tertiba ada bau pfume politikus ni?mana p mode gediks..lalala.k lah mau smbung kirja
renung2 kan dan selamat beramal!!!
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
mc lah arini.g jumpa doctor td..
doc : sakit apa?
me : tatau laa doc..tgh nk siap g koje td, rasa cm gelap je.
doc : smlm mkn tk mlm?
me : tak.ingt nk masak, tp tertido je smp kul 12mlm.dh tu mls mau mkn
*doctor pon cek2 laa blood prsure
doc : u kje apa?
me : pencacai dan pemikir
doc : hmm patutlah.cam ni..u stress sgt. i nasihatkan u kurang2 kan la mencacai dan
memikir.dah kawen ke blm ni?
me : belum doc(doctor ado anak encem ke?haha)
doc : kawen le cpt..hihi..sng skit.sakit pening ada org nk anto g klinik(smbl angkat2
kening)
me : erkk...dpt mc tak ni? (saja nk lari dr tupik)
doc : sy bg mc 1 hari..awk nk drv g kje pon bahaya.takut black out.sapa anta g
klinik?
me : drv sndri
doc : ramai org kje pencacai dan pemikir cam awak ni kawen lmbt ye
me : hehehe (dalam hati..I OBJECT.IRRELEVANT QUESTION!!)
yang penting sy dapat mc..hahaha..tp pale agak mmg pusing lah..k lah nk titon blk..
tertutup sudah pintu, pintu hatiku
yang pernah dibuka waktu, hanya untukmu
kini kau pergi dari hidupku
ku harus relakanmu walau aku tak mau
berjuta warna pelangi di dalam hati
sejenak luluh bergeming menjauh pergi
tak ada lagi cahaya suci
semua nada beranjak, aku terdiam sepi
dengarlah matahariku suara tangisanku
ku bersedih karna panah cinta menusuk jantungku
ucapkan matahariku puisi tentang hidupku
tentangku yang tak mampu melakukan waktu
dengarkanlah kau matahariku
dengarlah matahariku suara tangisanku
ku bersedih karna panah cinta menusuk jantungku
Monday, April 20, 2009
lately ni cam malas gila mau hapdet ke apa.,malas tu satu hal laa..bz pon ye gak.tp sib baik pasni kej kat opis tu ala2 berkurang skit.sbb ade loyer br masuk..n she s 9 yrs experience.good2..at least pasni lega skit pasaii smua coa ngn fed court file leh transfer kat dia..leh laa sy pokus skit kat criminal cases yg terbengkalai cam projek yg kna stop jer
anyway..sy bkn nk ceta psl kemalsan tahap gaban tu..sbb smua org tau sy adalah mls.so buang karan ceta pasal tu.
just something to ponder..have u guys heard about brutum fulmen?as a law practitioner, i only came across the maxim this morning when i read one article by NH Chan J, a retired judge from court of appeals..brutum fulmen ni bukannyer nama bf br saya yer..it s a legal principle inspired frm the latin maxim..jgn ada plak letak anak nama brutum fulmen (tp klu nk letak pon ok gak..mana tau leh ganti augustine paul ke..uhuhuh)
to read from its plain text, brutum fulmen means an empty noise. but law dictionary defines it as a judgment void on its face. when a judgment is void, it has no legal effect at all.
under wat situation brutum fulmen may occur? before i dive into more complicated issue, let me share a simple analogy where brutum fulmen may have taken place.
amek contoh kat uia or uitm.let say under tht university's regulation and order, it says any wrong committed by the students involving traffic offence shall be tried by the university's disciplinary board and no action shall be taken in court unless when it involves bodily injury.
so kata laa satu petang yg damai dan nyaman...angin bertiop sepoi2 bahasa hindustan.korang tdo dgn khusyu' nyer smp tak sedar ada tutorial ngn hamid J petang tu..or to make it worse, ngn mdm ramizah ke, sir bahar ke, mdm mahanon ke or mdm nik haizam ke..(hahah sj je aku letak nama2 ni sbb kelas diorg ni kelas maut..tak leh lmbt or ponteng). bukak je mata yg bselepet ngn taik mata tu, korg tgk jam dh kul 3 tepat.pd hal tutorial mmg start kuk 3 dah..konpem laa korg dh lambat.so terjun katil, capai kunci skuter n trus merempit pd kelajuan 150km/hr. laju tahap gaban dh nih n mat rempit pon kalah.
tgh2 sedap press minyak tuh, tetiba ada laa plak abg polis trafic nmpk.kebetulan abg polis tu br pas blk dating ngn akak jaga cafe kat kolej safiyah tu.so terjadi laa adegan kejar mengejar antara polis trafic tu ngn korg.nk tanak terpksa laa stop kan.
bila da stop tu, pa laagi..maka berlaku laa pulak satu perbualan atau sesi interogasi yg remeh, mengaibkan lagi memprejudiskan proses keadilan
polis : laju nampak
saya : dh lmbt dh ni ..ada exam kul 3.skang ni pon dh 3.05 (tipu
laa skit..nak idop.padahal tutorial je)
polis : lesen ngn ic ada?
saya : jap ek bang (sambil seluk2 beg gucci fake tu...zaman tu
mana ada duit nk bli yg ori beb)..haaa adapun.
polis : lmbt tak lambat..exam ke..sy peduli hape
saya : tlg laa bang (sambil kutuk dlm hati,, ewah polis ni, tau aa
jeles dulu nk masuk uia/uitm tak dpt.sapa suh isi borang
pakai pen merah)
polis : nah hamek saman ni (sambil hulur tiket saman)
so the summon reads; anda dikehendaki hadir di mahjkamah majistret selayan pada 12.1.2008 jam 9 pagi.
makanya, tanggal 12.1.2008 korang pon terpacak laa dpn court seawal jam 8 pagi dgn harapan dtg awl leh laa mintak saman kurang (bleh laa palk ko bgn awal kan time ni)
bila kes korang dipanggil..so biasanya dialog2 skema dan ala2 skrip lapuk ni pon terjadilah...
majistret: paham pertuduhan?
saya : paham tuan
majistret: ngaku salah?
saya : ngaku tuan (eh eh..encem lak tuan majistret nih..agak2
dh kawen ke blom?)
majistret: utk kesalahan ni awak bleh didenda smp 300 ringgit.masih
nk ngaku lagi?
saya : masih ngaku salah tuan (ngaku slh leh setel kes
cepat..pehtu mana tau aku leh ajak tuan majistret ni g
ngedet kaa)
majistret: baiklah.sy terima pengakuan kamu.dan sabit salah atas
atas kesalahan tersebut. sblm tu ada apa kamu nk buat
rayuan?
sambil garu garu kepala..
saya : sy nk mintak kurang denda tuan.sy ni tak kje pun.student
lagi.duat yuran pon pinjam ptptn tuan.
(time nih blm buat chambering lagi..dock brief tu pon
tatau menatang apa..so rayuan time tu ala2 okt sengal
je..haha)
*berbekalkan rayuan yg budus2 dan ala2 laymen je tuh..so korg pon dikehendaki bayor denda sbnyk 130 hengget.time tu rm130 tu kira bnyk laaa tau.leh g mkn ciken wing kat NZ smp 13 set..ye ahh satu set 10 hengget kan,,,(dalam hati smbl menyumpah laa kan kna smp rm130..pd hal klu byr saman kat pakguard uia/uitm tu dlm 50 hengget je)
the issue here, whether magistrate court was the correct forum to try this offence where the university's standing order n regulation has made it clear tht the power of court shall be ousted in cases of trafic offences committed in the university compound?and whether the decision given by the magistret shall be null and void?
adakah berlakunya ultra vires disini?adakah keputusan yg dibuat oleh majistret itu harus terbatal atas sebab bertentangan dgn undang2 atau harus terbatal kerana ia terletak diluar bidangkuasa?
ini adalah analogy mudah yg berlaku dlm kehidupan harian. skang ni sy nk direct ur attention to a situation wc is more complicated and this kind of situation, u ll not find it in ur mundane life.ia hanya terjadi 1001 tahun sekali sahaja sperti lintasan komet haley yg hanya kelihatan 75 tahun sekali sahaja.
may i humbly refer to article 72 of the federal contitution wc reads:
1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court.
(2) No person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him when taking part in proceedings of the Legislative Assembly of any State or of any committee thereof.
(3) No person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything published by or under the authority of the Legislative Assembly of any State.
speaker dewan perak, V sivakumar telah menggantung 7 org ahli dewan rakyat dr menghadiri persidangan selama beberapa bulan..(lupa daa rasa nye 10 bulan kot)
dissatisfied with the suspension, these 7 aliens(hahah slamba je pgl depa ni alien) have resorted the matted to the court. and our federal court consist 5 panel of judges ruled that,
SIVAKUMAR DOES NOT HAVE RIGHT TO SUSPEND SEVEN.
titik.noktah
this decision has somehow left big question mark to many..be it legal practitioner, academician, public and even former judge of COurt of Appeals, NH Chan J.
most are saying that fed court has overlooked the supreme law of the country ie our federal constitution (read artic;e 72) when they reach upon this decision.
but one has to distinguish whether the fed court has overlooked article 72 or disregard?
be that as it may, the tribe has spoken.
cumanya...apakah besar kemungkinan, suatu hari nnt jikalau sekiranya tan sri pandikar amin mulia mengeluarkan arahan menggantung anwar ibrahim ataupun karpal singh dr menghadiri sidang dewan selama 2 bulan, apakah mahkamah apex akan tetap mengatakan bahawa tan sri pandikar amin tidak ada kuasa untuk menggantung kehadiran karpal sing dan dsai?
renung2 kan dan selamat beramal!!!
Monday, April 6, 2009
kadang2 saya rasa amat sedih.takmau jadi loyer lagi.tak mo prektis lagi.tp 2 org ni sgt baik.slalu menghiburkan hati sy.nak resign pon amat tak smp hati.tenkiu ye kamu2 kerana melayan kerenah gila saya di kantor.tenkiu ya kamu2 walaupun saya selalu moody dikantor..tetap sabar sama saya..
kak izah and kak..entry dibuta bertujuan khas untuk meng-up kan u all tau..hihih..
eh eh..tiba2 je nak selit2 gambo sendiri...ini muka org tgh hepi sbb representasi LGT dah complete..
kak izah and kak..entry dibuta bertujuan khas untuk meng-up kan u all tau..hihih.. eh eh..tiba2 je nak selit2 gambo sendiri...ini muka org tgh hepi sbb representasi LGT dah complete..0klah..saya mau titon..nite 2u all peepss..muahhhh
Sunday, April 5, 2009
nothing
just a birthday wish
just a birthday wish
Friday, April 3, 2009
walaupun saya bukan penggemar kucing, tp aku tetap merasakan kucing diatas ni adalah comel yg amat.anyway, saya cuma mahu kongsi kegembiraan. though it is a bit of a delayed reaction (as the entry was not posted yesterday due to concentrating on LGT case), sy tetap gumbire.akhirnya anak guam saya dilepas dan dibebas. tidak perlu membela diri. hujahan panjang lebar 65 m/s akhirnya berhasil jugak. (cos my bos said it consists of a very weak argument).
suruh laa dia buat sendiri.geram pulak tetiba.hahah.
anyway, wish me luck for this new case. LG is coming in.phewwww...i hope AG will give full considerations and act accordingly as per wat we ask in our representation.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
smlm blk keje kul 8 lebih.
terus g singgah umah doyok.dia masa spageti yg amat cedapppnyeeee.
aku mkn dgn selera gila
rini, joko n man pon ada.
abg nik tentulah ada.
yok,
tenkiu.selalu2 laa masak lagi.leh aku mkn lagi.hahah
p/s:entry ini adalah ditulis dalam keadaan dipaksa oleh doyok :p
dari isnin smp smlm pon aku langsung tak tidur.dari pukul 12 mlm smp kul 8 pagi aku ngadap kerja. kul 8 aku tdo jap smp 9.30.before cabut g opis, aku sempat g ke satu tempat dahulu...huhuh..mintak2 lah kali ni doa dimakbulkan ..amiiiiin.
sepagi jam 9 lebih td, opis dh kol sbb bos bising aku tak mai lagi.ishh sengal btol laa..dh laa kerah tenaga aku suh siapkan mlm smlm gak.ayat plg bangang aku pnah dgr adalah "LAWYER MANA BOLEH TIDUR.MUST GIVE PRIORITY TO WORK. I WANT IT BEFORE 12 MIDNTE"
jawapan aku kepada encik bos,
"i know im a lawyer, but lawyrs are just like ordinary human being. we need to eat, sleep etc.i ll go back n get some sleep first.but i promise u the doc will reach ur mail early morning"
campak laa segala kerja kat aku selagi aku bernafas kat RDC tu. hahahahha.nnt klu aku dh memilih untuk tidak bernafas kat RDC lagi, campak laa pd org lain pulakk..hahah.gelak yg amat keji.
aku masuk opis td kul 1.30.hahah..sib baik dia tak bebel. tau pon wahai encik bos, campaklah apa kerja pon, aku akan buat. tp klu nk kje yg berkualiti, kna laa bsabar skit. buku sarkar, ratanlal dhirajlal on indian penal code tu bkn senipis kulit bawang.klu susun2 dah sama tgi dgn ego encik bos tau.
eh..mlm ni aku bjaya melunaskan semua hutang kerja. dan boleh tidur dengan amannya buat mlm ini. sehingga ke hari esok, masih lagi bernafas dgn tenang.
ok laa..mau tidur.
yeay dpt tdo awal.
aku yang gembira dapat tdo awal,
1.39am
khamis
;;
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
