Tahun 2015
8 years ago
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
the police made statement that a parang had been found in his car.
my question to the police who made such stupid and idiot statement,
THE PARANG HAD BEEN FOUND IN THE VICTIM'S CAR BEFORE OR AFTER THE SHOOTING?
if they found in the victim's car before the shooting, perhaps it could justify the shooting. BUT, if they had no knowledge about the existence of the parang in the victim's car prior to the shooting, what warranted the pulling of the trigger? not only once or twice..
even if the victim was in the possession of a parang, was there a real danger confronted by the police? ok senang ceta laa..police tu naik kereta, ade pistol..budak tu pun naik keta, tapi ade parang. adekah orang yg ade pistol akan rase takut dan rase keselamatannye tergugat dgn org yg bawak parang? dah laa tu, bukan nye face to face pon.
if u still could recall dato' bhalwant's case..i think it was decided in 2001/2002. the accused was charged of murder under s302. factual background of the case was that, dato' bhalwant was driving when his car was stopped by a motorcyclist. the motorcyclist was holding parang or kayu ( part ni aku tak ingat sgt, but dia pegang some sort of senjata laa).. then he threatened dato' bhalwant but the accused didnt pull the trigger right on the guy's face. he fired gunshot in the air first to intimidate the guy with the intention tht the guy wd back off and let go off him. but this fella was so adamant and tak takut dengan warning, then dia move towrds the accused.. bila dah tgk mcm tu, baru laa dato' bhalwant pulled the trigger utk kali keduanya n acu pistol tu dekat that guy.
dato' bhalwant was set free by the court as the court accepted his plea of self defence cos he had succesfully established that there was a real danger confronted by him to warrant his act of firing gunshot on the victim.
albeit the fact that he was acquitted, dia still kena charge in court jugak..btol tak? before the case was disposed in court, there were lots of speculations by the public..kekdahnye disini, kalau orang awam boleh hadapi segala spekulasi dan tuduhan2 mcm tu sebelum mahkamah buat keputusan, yang polis ni jadi real defensive ni apehal? tugas polis adelah utk menjaga keselamatan org ramai..to defend ppl's safety..bukan jadi DEFENSIVE tak tentu hala.
my question to the police who made such stupid and idiot statement,
THE PARANG HAD BEEN FOUND IN THE VICTIM'S CAR BEFORE OR AFTER THE SHOOTING?
if they found in the victim's car before the shooting, perhaps it could justify the shooting. BUT, if they had no knowledge about the existence of the parang in the victim's car prior to the shooting, what warranted the pulling of the trigger? not only once or twice..
even if the victim was in the possession of a parang, was there a real danger confronted by the police? ok senang ceta laa..police tu naik kereta, ade pistol..budak tu pun naik keta, tapi ade parang. adekah orang yg ade pistol akan rase takut dan rase keselamatannye tergugat dgn org yg bawak parang? dah laa tu, bukan nye face to face pon.
if u still could recall dato' bhalwant's case..i think it was decided in 2001/2002. the accused was charged of murder under s302. factual background of the case was that, dato' bhalwant was driving when his car was stopped by a motorcyclist. the motorcyclist was holding parang or kayu ( part ni aku tak ingat sgt, but dia pegang some sort of senjata laa).. then he threatened dato' bhalwant but the accused didnt pull the trigger right on the guy's face. he fired gunshot in the air first to intimidate the guy with the intention tht the guy wd back off and let go off him. but this fella was so adamant and tak takut dengan warning, then dia move towrds the accused.. bila dah tgk mcm tu, baru laa dato' bhalwant pulled the trigger utk kali keduanya n acu pistol tu dekat that guy.
dato' bhalwant was set free by the court as the court accepted his plea of self defence cos he had succesfully established that there was a real danger confronted by him to warrant his act of firing gunshot on the victim.
albeit the fact that he was acquitted, dia still kena charge in court jugak..btol tak? before the case was disposed in court, there were lots of speculations by the public..kekdahnye disini, kalau orang awam boleh hadapi segala spekulasi dan tuduhan2 mcm tu sebelum mahkamah buat keputusan, yang polis ni jadi real defensive ni apehal? tugas polis adelah utk menjaga keselamatan org ramai..to defend ppl's safety..bukan jadi DEFENSIVE tak tentu hala.
Label law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 tukang karut:
biar je la polis siasat...bising2 pun bukan leh buat ape...
bullet,
ini bukan polis yg kena siasat..sbb the quest involve police officers. there ll be conflict of interest. hope the maxim nemo judex in causa sua rings a bell to you!lagi pun tak salah kan nk bagai komen? in fact it is a fair comment. read article 10 malaysian constitution!
nk dgr lg satu LAWAK?parang tu dikatakan dijumpai di dalam bonet kereta arwah aminulrashid.
terror weih, polis msia ade mata superman boleh tembus besi nmpak ade parang dlm bonet!
sha,
wokey i didnt about tht..but sumpah lawak terhebat zaman ini..kalau takat parang dalam bonet pon dah kecut perut, tak yah jadi polis laa beb... baik pegi jadi tokan ikan ke, ahli nujum ke, penari dangdut ke..apa2 je lah
Hahaha, lawak2 best!!
sha & emon: mungkin dia pakai spek permata hijrah, tu yang pandangan leh tembus..dan kepada bullet (siape jugelah kamu itu, sila diam jika kau tiada ilmu (maksudnye jgn bodoh sombong, jika taktau bertanya bukan berlagak okay!) dan sila periksa dulu dengan siapa yang kau mengajukan komen sebodoh itu..
p/s: lady ohara sile approve komen ini..PUBLISH!
hida,
mungkin kita perlu ketengahkan konsep silence is golden.
nana,
pada pendapat aku, bukan sbb pakai spek robocop atau pun spek hijrah..tp aku rase rabun lah sebenarnya
aku suke jer bile ko bercerita atau entry ko berunsur law cenggini. sebab bila kau bc,bulu roma aku macam tegak pulak. aku over react atau bulu roma aku?
nurul+hafiz,
aku rase bulu roma kau agak over laa...alang2 bulu roma dh tegak, buat rebonding je trus.x payah sikat lagi, guna jari pun boleh
Post a Comment